Hi Michael,
Are they actually evading detection for you?
Well, yes and no, mostly no.
I have something like 8 to 10 total messages each relating to various forms of AAA, Sam’s Club, Costco, BlueCross, Fedx, etc. Of this large volume I frequently get just one of each in my inbox. So overall the percentage of capture is pretty good. I religiously train these as spam. but every few days there are new ones.
I have only made a cursory sampling of these message ‘received’ headers, so far they all come from places I don’t expect mail from, mostly China, India or Eastern Europe.
Than’t not to say, I don’t get a lot of spam from American ip’s, I do, but those seem to be universally accurately classified.
As I mentioned in the forum post, I think these spammers are ‘pros’ actively working to evade anti-spam tools. So it’s a moving target.
As for ip blocking causing more of a problem than it fixes, I agree that’s likely if applied as a blanket feature. What regions to block would have to be under user control. I think that’s why ISP’s don’t do this. It’s a very user specific thing, I guess it would have to be something like “block all messages from {china | India | Pakistan} unless the sender is in my contacts” or something like that. While that might work well, it would require user maintenance, so from a developer perspective it might not work as a general feature.
I have attached a diagnostic report but I’m not suggesting there is a SpamSieve problem. My annoyance is more that the ‘enemy’ occasionally get’s through.
Thanks for your response and attention to this. I have to say SpamSieve really is so good, that it’s one of a very few reasons I’m still with Apple after many reasons to switch to Linux. There really is nothing that compares.
Best regards,
Glen Ihrig
SpamSieve Diagnostic Report.tbz